Asus H110M-A/DP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/DP  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '23 at 12:52
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 222
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 610
61% 498 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.14% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 135
Parallax 8
6% 49.9 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 11.1
7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.14%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 100 85 100 97 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 401
Write 225
Mixed 301
SusWrite 89.7
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 0.9
66% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 42.7
DQ Mixed 17.3
33% 68.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
671GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 194 193 194 195 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 185
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 192
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA266.C16FJ 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A/DP Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/DP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback