Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

16 months ago, 14 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400T 4,070 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 79.3 1-Core 87 2-Core 172 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 288 31% 245 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia 940MX 36,213 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Acer(1025 1189) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7667 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Lighting 13.2 Reflection 12.7 Parallax 12.2 11% 12.7 fps	MRender 12 Gravity 13.7 Splatting 9.1 9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 238GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 349 358 422 410 368 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 338 Write 368 Mixed 350 SusWrite 367 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 32.9 103% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 290 224% 306 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AO1P24HC4U1-BSHS AM1P24HC8T1-BURS 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.6% Average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 14.9 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 11.9 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 81.9 49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	43x
940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 36,213 samples	8x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8180S3128GI 128GBKingstonBench 61%, 1,733 samples	7x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x
CS1311 480GBPNY $31Bench 86%, 13,149 samples	1x

RAM
HMA81GS6MFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 36%, 6,703 samples	9x
AO1P24HC4U1-BSHS AM1P24HC8T1-BURS 12GBAdataBench 55%, 4 samples	4x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	4x