Acer Aspire Z24-880

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire Z24-880  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Z24-880
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170629
Uptime19.4 Days
Run DateMay 26 '24 at 03:58
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 162
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 314
42% 312 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1189) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 5.7
4% 5.43 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.3
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SPCC M.2 PCIe SS 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H211 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 849 833 580 403 320 284 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,285
Write 1,044
Mixed 933
SusWrite 545
213% 952 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 33.1
100% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 206
159% 220 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 126%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P24HC4U1-BSHS AM1P24HC8T1-BURS 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.6% Above average
MC Read 24
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 15.8
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 17.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 13 104 78 60 23" 1280 720 ACRF132 AIO LCD
Typical Aspire Z24-880 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Z24-880

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback