Lenovo 82AU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82AU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory16.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200511
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 04 '23 at 20:21
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 55.5
1-Core 21.4
2-Core 42.7
28% 39.9 Pts
4-Core 70.6
8-Core 98.7
11% 84.6 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 34%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3A42) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 2.5
2% 19.2 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.4
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ128HBHQ-000L2 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AL2QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 6.9 8.7 8.8 8.8 9.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 981
Write 9.3
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 8.5
53% 254 MB/s
4K Read 121
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.6
187% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 169%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 240GB
55GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 75 94 92 95 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 318
Write 260
Mixed 251
SusWrite 90.4
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 13
47% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 101
83% 119 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82AU Builds (Compare 1,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82AU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback