Gigabyte GA-H310M S2P 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2P 2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211110
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 13:26
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 94
2-Core 164
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 269
30% 236 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 3.8
2% 3.83 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 6.2
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 43 9 9.9 9.1 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 572
Write 286
Mixed 500
SusWrite 34.1
77% 348 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 43.2
138% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 491
DQ Write 98.9
DQ Mixed 161
153% 250 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 220%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Kingston 9905713-030.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.8% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19.7
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 16
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2P 2.0 Builds (Compare 604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2P 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback