Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_D1603QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_D1603QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M1603QA
Memory4.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220309
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 12 '23 at 15:23
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
43% Average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 60
2-Core 107
43% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 367
33% 279 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 43%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 12AD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.14
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 33.5
20% 25.6 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 12.9
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 605 689 673 641 668 669 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 955
Write 692
Mixed 639
SusWrite 658
165% 736 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 38.2
123% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 294
211% 277 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 129%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Samsung M471A5244BB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.9% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 23.9
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 19.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_D1603QA Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_D1603QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback