Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_X515JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_X515JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JAB
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '24 at 16:51
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CIV-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 135
58% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 396
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Asus(1043 1F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
7.26% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 12.1
9% 10.2 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 14
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.26%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 32 28 70 29 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 1,134
Write 744
Mixed 698
SusWrite 109
149% 671 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 51.6
156% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 333
278% 393 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 120%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Samsung M471A5244BB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.3% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 8.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_X515JA Builds (Compare 1,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_X515JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback