Machenike Machenike S16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics87.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemMachenike Machenike S16  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHENIKE NP60PNP-HMx
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '23 at 17:04
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 138
58% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 238
24% 193 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 866C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.5% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 117
Parallax 108
91% 112 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 89.6
Splatting 81.6
81% 103 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL5-8D512 512GB
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EX92101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 740 852 937 379 137 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,250
Write 989
Mixed 1,071
SusWrite 530
215% 960 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 47
140% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 234
182% 258 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 139%
Great: 208%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
130GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 387 429 438 355 324 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 458
Mixed 446
SusWrite 387
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 31.7
111% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 243
196% 278 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kimtigo (HK) Limited KTFGS4AE8 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 19.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Machenike S16 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

System: Machenike Machenike S16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback