Machenike L15C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMachenike L15C  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHENIKE V157PNPQ-HMx
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220616
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 23:21
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 57.4
1-Core 180
2-Core 361
101% 199 Pts
4-Core 683
8-Core 1,181
113% 932 Pts
64-Core 1,976
122% 1,976 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 0155) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3699
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.5% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 122
Parallax 115
103% 121 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 95.7
Splatting 83.9
84% 106 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL5-8D512 512GB
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EX92101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 904
Write 241
Mixed 292
104% 479 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 35
193% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 399
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 296
233% 324 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 208%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 32GB
28GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.3
Write 19.4
Mixed 20.4
27% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 2.6
203% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kimtigo (HK) Limited KTFGS4AE8 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 8.9
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0910
Typical L15C Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

System: Machenike L15C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback