Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 177 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 72.6 1-Core 78.8 2-Core 121 56% 90.8 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 466 43% 359 Pts	64-Core 3,093 191% 3,093 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 39.9 Parallax 37.9 30% 38.2 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 26.8 27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 1TB 1,067 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 522GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 480 484 485 486 486 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 520 Write 490 Mixed 463 SusWrite 484 110% 489 MB/s	4K Read 50.3 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 68.5 223% 76.6 MB/s	DQ Read 329 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 279 213% 289 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 120%
Samsung MZ1LB1T9HALS-000FB 2TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 260% 618GB free Firmware: EDA73F2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 558 582 603 616 637 699 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 805 Write 451 Mixed 374 SusWrite 616 125% 562 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 67.1 184% 72.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,048 DQ Write 682 DQ Mixed 635 535% 788 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 283%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 359GB free Firmware: SDM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 98 98 101 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 114 Write 120 Mixed 66.9 SusWrite 98.6 73% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SHB724G4LML23P2-SB 00CE00B300CE SHB724G4LML23P2-SB 00CE00B300CE SHB724G4LML23P2-SB 00CE00B300CE SHB724G4LML23P2-SB 00CE063200CE M393A4K40BB0-CPB 00CE063200CE M393A4K40BB0-CPB 00CE00B300CE M393A4K40BB0-CPB 00CE00B300CE M393A4K40... 511GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	MC Read 45.3 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 35 113% 39.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 14.1 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 95.5 42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	39x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2698 v31stBench 67%, 177 samples	38x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v31stBench 68%, 827 samples	24x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 361 samples	69x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	10x

SSD
870 1TBSamsungBench 91%, 1,067 samples	60x
MZ1LB1T9HALS-000FB 2TBSamsungBench 260%, 30 samples	27x
870 2TBSamsungBench 87%, 510 samples	8x

RAM
SHB724G4LML23P2-SB 00CE00B300CE SHB724G4LML23P2-SB 00CE00B300CE SHB724G4LML23P2-SB 00CE00B300CE SHB724G4LML23P2-SB 00CE063200CE M393A4K40BB0-CPB 00CE063200CE M393A4K40BB0-CPB 00CE00B300CE M393A4K40BB0-CPB 00CE00B300CE M393A4K40... 511GBUnknownBench 84%, 12 samples	12x
36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 002C00B3002C 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 002C00B3002C 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 002C00B3002C 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 00AD00B300AD HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 00AD00B300AD HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 00AD00B300AD HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 00AD00B300AD HMA42GR7MFR4N... 384GBUnknownBench 52%, 13 samples	11x
M393A4K40BB0-CPB 00CE00B300CE M393A4K40BB0-CPB 00CE00B300CE M393A4K40BB0-CPB 00CE00B300CE M393A4K40BB0-CPB 00CE063200CE M393A4K40BB0-CPB 00CE063200CE M393A4K40BB0-CPB 00CE063200CE M393A4K40BB0-CPB 00CE063200CE M393A4K40BB0-CPB... 511GBUnknownBench 80%, 11 samples	10x