Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory122.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 09:16
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 130
50% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 515
46% 388 Pts
64-Core 2,081
129% 2,081 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 315
Nvidia(10DE 102F) 1GB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 392.68
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.29% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 0.4
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.29%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$72
830GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 439 437 440 391 393 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 434
Mixed 401
SusWrite 419
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 37.4
125% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 289
234% 332 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 60.4
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 48.8
146% 51.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.9
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 123%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $63
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback