Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82RJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82RJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 14 '23 at 06:14
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.5% Poor
Memory 28.8
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 77.5
28% 50.3 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 245
22% 187 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3B3A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3251
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 13.1
10% 14.9 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 14.7
14% 17.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL2 256GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 515 560 521 138 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 635
Write 451
Mixed 514
SusWrite 385
111% 496 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 18.1
64% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 68.2
DQ Mixed 130
94% 125 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 74%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/8G Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 21.1
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.9
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 262
15% 262 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82RJ Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82RJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback