HP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 24-ca1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 24-ca1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89E9
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '23 at 12:38
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-12400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 81.3
1-Core 158
2-Core 312
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 822
81% 663 Pts
64-Core 1,020
63% 1,020 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
HP(103C 89E9) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
7.3% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 8.9
6% 28.4 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 10.4
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KBG50ZNV512G KIOXIA 512GB
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AN00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1055 414 418 425 427 420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,759
Write 1,478
Mixed 1,027
SusWrite 527
267% 1,198 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 54.1
179% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 810
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 654
462% 599 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 184%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-091.A00G Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 36.3
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 26.7
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 24-ca1xxx Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 24-ca1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback