Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics94.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 26 '23 at 19:15
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700KF-$225
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 36.5
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 178
50% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 362
33% 279 Pts
64-Core 1,076
67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.9% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 112
Parallax 116
101% 118 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 82
83% 105 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDEV2TB-D8 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 513 637 653 657 582 678 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 340
Write 496
Mixed 363
SusWrite 620
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 9.4
39% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 161
170% 280 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 331%
SanDisk SSD PLUS 240GB
109GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 0 2.1 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 159
Write 22
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 2.7
40% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG16GX4M1E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 21.1
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 51%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 6,932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $507
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback