Fujitsu ESPRIMO P400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P400  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2990-A3
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130117
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 30 '23 at 18:11
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 145
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 227
26% 206 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.9% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 60
Parallax 76.3
46% 64.1 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 43.2
44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$30
766GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 44 14 37 51 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 68
Write 75.2
Mixed 30
SusWrite 39.3
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 46%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
180GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 54
Write 26.2
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 27.9
25% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
432% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G6E1 0443 RMR5030MJ68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.7% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P400 Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $193
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback