Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	66.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C08
Motherboard	MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) (all builds)
Memory	21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200106
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '23 at 21:24
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Memory 78.4 1-Core 119 2-Core 204 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 783 78% 633 Pts	64-Core 826 51% 826 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% HP(103C 8553) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.29 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.6% Good	Lighting 87 Reflection 89 Parallax 77.3 71% 84.4 fps	MRender 63.7 Gravity 77.4 Splatting 71.3 58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 73%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB 9,606 User benchmarks, average bench 403% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,063 Write 932 Mixed 926 217% 973 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 89 4K Mixed 56.4 179% 61.6 MB/s	DQ Read 919 DQ Write 678 DQ Mixed 856 624% 818 MB/s
Poor: 253% Great: 515%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4DFD8266.C16FE Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2667, 2667 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	72% Very good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 24.3 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 17.1 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 83.6 48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

SSD
SSDPEKNW256G8 256GBIntelBench 119%, 1,046 samples	161x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	111x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $41Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	88x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	340x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	218x
CM4X8GD3000C16K4D 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 12,037 samples	126x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $352