Today's hottest deals

Apple iMacPro1,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemApple iMacPro1,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-7BA5B2D9E42DDD94
Memory120.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 17:13
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2140B
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 75.7
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 936
83% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,232
76% 1,232 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Apple(106B 017C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 786 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.45.40.15
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.3% Very good
Lighting 104
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 153
84% 90.7 fps
MRender 73.3
Gravity 106
Splatting 60.7
64% 79.8 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP2048 2TB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 129
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1605 1611 1621 1649 1642 1696 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
187GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 423 425 429 429 436 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 457
Write 447
Mixed 395
SusWrite 428
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 27.6
90% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 149
110% 145 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D2 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
125% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 58.1
MC Mixed 46.8
143% 50.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 125%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMacPro1,1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Apple iMacPro1,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 142% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback