Today's hottest deals

Zoostorm 7200-5024A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemZoostorm 7200-5024A  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B85-HD3
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140924
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '23 at 03:16
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 192
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 522
55% 439 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
HP(103C 82E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2777 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 224
Parallax 137
113% 167 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 144
Splatting 120
105% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2L5Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 141 31 45 146 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 291
Write 75.4
Mixed 119
SusWrite 116
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 22.1
96% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 60.7
80% 151 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 80%
Intel 540s Series 120GB
18GB free
Firmware: 042C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 416
Mixed 401
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 41.2
138% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 210
178% 258 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 0423 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 0423 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 16.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5024A Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Zoostorm 7200-5024A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback