Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170124
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateDec 02 '17 at 09:25
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 88.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 255
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 656
68% 546 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 196
Parallax 180
174% 196 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 170
Splatting 119
112% 139 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 142%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
465GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 414
Mixed 421
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 50
196% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 47.9
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 107
100% 147 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
238GB free
Firmware: DXM04B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 474
Mixed 502
111% 498 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 27.8
157% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 73.8
126% 247 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 111%
Great: 116%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 376
Write 303
Mixed 309
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 24.2
128% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 40.9
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 24.1
43% 81 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 129
Write 130
Mixed 121
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.29
104% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 97%
HDD 6TB
283GB free, PID 2551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 82.5
Write 91.2
Mixed 86.9
114% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.62
4K Mixed 0.27
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M1A1600C10 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback