Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6500B APU 1,094 User benchmarks, average bench 52% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22.5% Poor	Memory 31.3 1-Core 48.6 2-Core 67.5 29% 49.1 Pts	4-Core 81.1 8-Core 73.7 11% 77.4 Pts	64-Core 119 7% 119 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D 8,328 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 3089) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2501.0 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	2.56% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 4 Parallax 4.6 2% 3.73 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 5.4 3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.56% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Imation 2.5" SATA3 120GB SSD A320 29 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 231 83 84 98 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 325 Write 189 Mixed 244 SusWrite 142 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 19.8 83% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 212 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 162 135% 195 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Kingston ACR256X64D3U13C9G 4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 4.2 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 247 16% 247 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16