Toshiba Satellite C55-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C55-C  (all builds)
MotherboardFF50 06F2
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160325
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 22 '23 at 07:12
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.92% Terrible
Memory 11.9
1-Core 11.5
2-Core 23.8
9% 15.7 Pts
4-Core 45.2
8-Core 51.2
6% 48.2 Pts
64-Core 7.8
0% 7.8 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 9.92%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F840) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 5.8
3% 6.13 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 6.8
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 250GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 151 170 183 196 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 312
Write 254
Mixed 164
SusWrite 173
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 6.4
31% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 34.1
DQ Mixed 15.8
27% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 151%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
428GB free
Firmware: AX1P4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 94 93 95 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 98.1
Write 107
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 93.2
60% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 62%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
192GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 68 65 64 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 49.2
Write 65.4
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 66
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
139% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1119 S939A2SGS-ITR 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
8.6% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 387
10% 387 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C55-C Builds (Compare 478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback