Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506ICB
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 17:48
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 180
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 557
55% 450 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16AD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 19.6
12% 36.5 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 16.8
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1475 1561 1322 282 385 386 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,547
Write 1,518
Mixed 1,398
SusWrite 902
302% 1,341 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 50.2
162% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 854
DQ Write 639
DQ Mixed 766
568% 753 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 201%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback