Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-14D2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Modern 14 B11SB
MotherboardMSI MS-14D2  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '23 at 04:20
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 43.9
1-Core 138
2-Core 207
69% 130 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 355
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
MSI(1462 12E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 19
11% 18.3 fps
MRender 19.6
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 15.5
15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 850 923 954 1047 998 1007 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,280
Write 1,079
Mixed 935
SusWrite 963
239% 1,064 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 72.9
250% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 615
DQ Write 463
DQ Mixed 263
272% 447 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 212%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 8.2
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 5.3
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-14D2 Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-14D2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback