Asus B85M-E/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsus B85M-E/BR  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141027
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 25 '23 at 03:50
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 110
58% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 146
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3718) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.3% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 67
56% 69.3 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 65.4
54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 134 165 146 101 16 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.7% Below average
Read 144
Write 93.2
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 114
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 13.4
44% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 43.4
DQ Mixed 74.1
60% 88.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 102%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
218GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 123 138 127 140 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 144
Write 106
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 130
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 96%
Seagate ST3120827AS 120GB-$38
11GB free
Firmware: 3.42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 45 44 45 45 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 249
Write 8.8
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 44.3
58% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 32%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 89 86 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 63.8
Write 43.6
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 86.9
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 58%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 2.8 3 3 2.8 1.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 301
Write 2.2
SusWrite 2.4
68% 102 MB/s
4K Read 92.8
4K Mixed 0
516% 46.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 18
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 14.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E/BR Builds (Compare 610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback