HP Z1 Entry Tower G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z1 Entry Tower G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8591
Memory25.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220919
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateApr 29 '23 at 14:26
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$237
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 257
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 791
79% 644 Pts
64-Core 733
45% 733 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
HP(103C 372B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.66
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 165
Parallax 164
131% 163 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 144
Splatting 122
118% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 455
Write 245
Mixed 330
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 44.7
145% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 332
251% 338 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
168GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 378 407 427 423 418 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 462
Write 413
Mixed 49
SusWrite 382
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 0.8
46% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 46.1
DQ Mixed 0.9
26% 64.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 99%
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB
60GB free
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,144
Write 1,866
Mixed 1,602
416% 1,871 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 65.2
215% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,248
DQ Write 1017
DQ Mixed 1,116
840% 1,127 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 306%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6CJR8N-VK HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK HMA82GU6CJR8N-VK HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK 48GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.5% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 26.2
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 23.2
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z1 Entry Tower G5 Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

System: HP Z1 Entry Tower G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $506
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback