Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Supermicro X9DAi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DAi
Memory	7.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130805
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '17 at 01:24
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 81.1 2-Core 161 63% 107 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 493 49% 398 Pts	64-Core 788 49% 788 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 311.15 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 475GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 37188 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 79 (B1) Unknown 98 98 16 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 50 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 38 (F1) Unknown 99 99 73666097972	79.4% Very good	Read 496 Write 338 Mixed 353 88% 396 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 22.3 99% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 83.3 96% 167 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 126%
Samsung Portable SSD T1 1TB 331 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 184GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 308 Write 175 Mixed 223 52% 236 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 23.3 76% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 67 62% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 79%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 7791 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 98 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 53 53 34716 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 91 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 50 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 47 (C2) HDA temperature 102 94 50 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	82% Excellent	Read 162 Write 123 Mixed 118 101% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.4 139% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 391GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 161 160 6950 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1029 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 13 13 63526 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1026 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 13 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1028 (C2) HDA temperature 106 99 44 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48% Average	Read 90.4 Write 76.4 Mixed 74.3 60% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.46 122% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-139.A 2x16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.6% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 15.4 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 9.6 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Yacht

System: Supermicro X9DAi

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GBElpidaBench 91%, 25 samples	12x
M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 200 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $252

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16