Lenovo 30E1S6F400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 246%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive409% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemLenovo 30E1S6F400  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1046
Memory500.2 GB free of 512 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210519
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '23 at 08:08
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 71.3
1-Core 141
2-Core 273
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 1,075
95% 808 Pts
64-Core 5,401
334% 5,401 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 8000
Nvidia(10DE 129E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 48GB, Driver: 526.67
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 209
Parallax 231
174% 218 fps
MRender 271
Gravity 230
Splatting 196
186% 232 fps
Poor: 132%
This bench: 163%
Great: 173%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL7 1TB
571GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3198 2377 1890 1882 1909 1908 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
409% Outstanding
Read 2,896
Write 3,338
Mixed 3,052
SusWrite 2,194
648% 2,870 MB/s
4K Read 79
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 108
348% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1224
DQ Write 1,046
DQ Mixed 1,126
846% 1,132 MB/s
Poor: 204%
This bench: 409%
Great: 454%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393AAG40M32-CAE 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
180% Outstanding
MC Read 71.6
MC Write 71.1
MC Mixed 75.4
208% 72.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 37.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 180%
Great: 180%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback