Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82C4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82C4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '23 at 20:20
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 172
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 246
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Legend(17AA 3FDC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 6.3
5% 6.43 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Consistent M.2 S6 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0203A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 326 356 363 382 386 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 386
Write 325
Mixed 339
SusWrite 351
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 14
59% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 33.5
63% 122 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AS008G-3200ST Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82C4 Builds (Compare 592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback