Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 05 '23 at 13:37
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 172
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 296
37% 283 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 881A) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 10.5
6% 8.97 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 6.8
6% 8.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 9.5 6.4 5.5 20 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 409
Write 178
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 52.6
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 16.4
64% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 65.2
DQ Mixed 40.8
43% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 53%
Consistent S6 128GB
100GB free
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 367 382 360 347 368 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 452
Write 382
Mixed 389
SusWrite 361
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 27.7
130% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 49.1
92% 178 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 DDR4 2400 2OZ 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.4% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 12.3
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,928 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback