Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 23,588 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	37.7% Below average	Memory 32.5 1-Core 68.1 2-Core 127 41% 75.9 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 329 35% 280 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1331) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	4.79% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 58.9 Parallax 4.4 4% 22.9 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 8.9 5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.79% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Consistent S6 128GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: VE0R840H SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 114 159 133 158 145 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 287 Write 294 Mixed 289 SusWrite 145 57% 254 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 18.7 64% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 57.8 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 94.2 88% 129 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB 73,050 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 9.3 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 3.8 14% 4.73 GB/s	Latency 241 17% 241 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	56	32	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD065A

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	6,085x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	3,523x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	955x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	1,232x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 188%, 4,220 samples	1,053x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples	751x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 2,420 samples	864x
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 4,751 samples	766x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	743x