Fujitsu CELSIUS R970

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics99.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R970  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3488-A1
Memory499.6 GB free of 512 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '23 at 12:46
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4114
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 147
55% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 589
52% 444 Pts
64-Core 1,911
118% 1,911 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 1425) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.9% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 135
Parallax 124
101% 128 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 131
Splatting 115
98% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS2ZC360
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 73 86 83 90 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 87.8
Write 89.7
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 83.4
53% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
96% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA8GL7AMR4N-VK 8x31.9GB
8 of 16 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.1% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 15.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R970 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R970

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback