Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3355 929 User benchmarks, average bench 25% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Memory 19.7 1-Core 16.9 2-Core 38.2 15% 24.9 Pts	4-Core 38.9 8-Core 55.6 6% 47.2 Pts	64-Core 45.8 3% 45.8 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 31%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1124) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.59% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 2.1 2% 1.7 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.4 2% 2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.59% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS64GSSD420K 64GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1225CE Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 235 Write 130 Mixed 148 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 15.6 52% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 94.9 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 62.3 58% 89.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 871GB free Firmware: MS2OA8K0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 154 Write 156 Mixed 39.4 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix Se HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 1x4GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.01% Terrible	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 2.5 9% 3 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 323 12% 323 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.01% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3355IntelBench 25%, 929 samples	20x
Pentium J4205IntelBench 33%, 1,095 samples	20x
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	6x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	14x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	11x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	9x

SSD
TS64GSSD420K 64GBTranscendBench 64%, 60 samples	5x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	3x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $41Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x

RAM
Se HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 18%, 48 samples	13x
Se HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 27%, 50 samples	7x
ACR16D3LS1KDGR/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 19%, 274 samples	5x