Lenovo 20208

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20208  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20208
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime36.2 Days
Run DateDec 06 '17 at 11:22
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 74
2-Core 120
61% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 177
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5003) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 3.35
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.36 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.13
2% 2.82 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 503
Write 124
Mixed 188
59% 272 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 21.6
86% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 65.2
82% 151 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79
243GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 75.4
Write 79.9
Mixed 79.5
59% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.17
71% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20208 Builds (Compare 272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20208

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback