Asrock H61M-HG4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-HG4  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '23 at 23:12
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 166
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 409
45% 356 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.3% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 35.9
28% 36 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 25.2
26% 32.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0302B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 229 191 116 113 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64% Good
Read 263
Write 240
Mixed 240
SusWrite 166
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 26.8
116% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 44.1
74% 143 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
258GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 118 120 122 122 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 120
Write 113
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 116
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX316C10/8 16GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-HG4 Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback