PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61M-HG4 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130711 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 20 '23 at 23:12 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | PHL-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
65.6%
Good
|
64% 110 Pts
|
45% 356 Pts
|
27% 436 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.3%
Poor
|
28% 36 fps
|
26% 32.8 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston A400 480GB-$38
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0302B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 229 191 116 113 185 MB/s
|
64%
Good
|
51% 227 MB/s
|
116% 42 MB/s
|
74% 143 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
258GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 118 120 122 122 123 MB/s
|
67.7%
Good
|
76% 103 MB/s
|
170% 1.1 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX316C10/8 16GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
41.8%
Average
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
45% 88.9 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 35x |
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 18x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 17x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 15x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 14x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $384 |