Asrock H61M-HG4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-HG4  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 19 '22 at 11:00
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 511
55% 440 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia(10DE 0915) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0302B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 237 229 232 235 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.9% Above average
Read 256
Write 233
Mixed 234
SusWrite 233
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 21.9
90% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 42
70% 135 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
260GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 121 122 123 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 109
Write 110
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 121
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST380811AS 80GB-$99
22GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 57 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 14.7
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 57
26% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX316C10/8 16GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-HG4 Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback