Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics62.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131122
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '17 at 02:11
Run Duration499 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 136
62% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 439
41% 341 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.9% Good
Lighting 80.1
Reflection 76.8
Parallax 66.8
65% 74.6 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 73.4
58% 70.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 376
Write 265
Mixed 292
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 32.4
116% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 83
DQ Mixed 60
61% 101 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
453GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 153
Mixed 153
118% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.35
96% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 112%
HP Photosmart 7520 8GB
5GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
7.83% Terrible
Read 12
Write 5.96
Mixed 7.25
10% 8.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.83
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 1
90% 1.72 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.83%
Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer Facet 8GB
1GB free, PID 5576
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
7.62% Terrible
Read 21
Write 3.01
Mixed 5.47
9% 9.84 MB/s
4K Read 4.66
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.9
79% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.62%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.3% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback