bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '23 at 20:01
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 88%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 186
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 688
61% 518 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2310) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12027.9001
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.4% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 57.1
Parallax 70.9
35% 57 fps
MRender 57.9
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 42.3
42% 52.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 137GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 232 166 176 148 166 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 394
Write 300
Mixed 290
SusWrite 193
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 12.2
40% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 40.7
DQ Write 38.2
DQ Mixed 39.7
30% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.7% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.3
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.4
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback