Today's hottest deals

HP 860-019

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemHP 860-019  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 23:08
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 91%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 159
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 406
48% 374 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3586 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.4% Very good
Lighting 84.7
Reflection 108
Parallax 69.4
69% 87.2 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 84.9
Splatting 77.2
73% 91.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$92
538GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 336 342 432 397 415 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 396
Write 362
Mixed 308
SusWrite 376
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 30.4
89% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 279
230% 331 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 83%
Great: 137%
Sandisk SD7SB3Q-128G-1006 128GB
55GB free
Firmware: X2180006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 271 289 308 307 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 336
Write 250
Mixed 207
SusWrite 290
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 19.9
74% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 144
148% 242 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 0215 CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 M378A1G43DB0-CPB 0215 CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.2% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 19
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 860-019 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: HP 860-019

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback