Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 14-cm0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 14-cm0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A0
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '23 at 18:10
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Memory 16.3
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 58.7
20% 36.1 Pts
4-Core 47.2
8-Core 61.6
7% 54.4 Pts
64-Core 63.8
4% 63.8 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 84A0) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT24H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 111 122 112 104 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40% Below average
Read 231
Write 298
Mixed 244
SusWrite 122
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 15.7
53% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 142
109% 149 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 40%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FR 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 349
12% 349 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14-cm0xxx Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-cm0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback