Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 5150 APU R3 1,478 User benchmarks, average bench 32% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Memory 39.8 1-Core 15.5 2-Core 30 20% 28.4 Pts	4-Core 48.9 8-Core 77.1 8% 63 Pts	64-Core 80 5% 80 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3 11,968 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	1.82% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 2.8 2% 2.87 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.5 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.82% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L1 128GB 522 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT04L0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 342 Write 338 Mixed 284 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 18.5 67% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 154 114% 152 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 107%
Generic UDISK 34GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 22GB free, PID 1320 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 12.5 Write 3.2 Mixed 5.5 7% 7.07 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 38% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5474-038.A00LF 8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 5.8 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 5.5 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 203 20% 203 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 5150 APU R3AMDBench 32%, 1,478 samples	19x
Sempron 2650 APU R3AMDBench 25%, 658 samples	11x
Athlon 5350 APU R3AMDBench 34%, 3,720 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	2x
99U5584-010.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 1,411 samples	2x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28