Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Monster TULPAR T7 V19.3

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	66.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V19.3 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V19.3
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190614
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '23 at 13:46
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 197 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 628 61% 503 Pts	64-Core 835 52% 835 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Device(1D05 1065) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3598 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.1% Good	Lighting 81.8 Reflection 123 Parallax 77.5 67% 94.2 fps	MRender 95.8 Gravity 76.4 Splatting 70.4 65% 80.9 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 222GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 912 648 647 641 626 517 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	206% Outstanding	Read 2,084 Write 1,803 Mixed 1,376 SusWrite 665 331% 1,482 MB/s	4K Read 45.5 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 54.5 176% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 737 DQ Write 495 DQ Mixed 643 472% 625 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 296%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$64 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 232GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 83 84 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 92.9 Write 86.7 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 83.6 59% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 71%
Seagate Ultra Slim GD 1TB 435 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 220GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 39 39 40 41 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 29.8 Write 30.7 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 39.2 24% 32.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905744-113.A01G 2x16GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.5% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 18.9 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 86.6 46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V19.3 Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V19.3

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	201x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	116x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	83x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	2x

SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	29x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	25x
MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 199%, 3,806 samples	13x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	69x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	63x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370