Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 3227A52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3227A52  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '23 at 05:50
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470T-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 126
56% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 208
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3083) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 383
Write 176
Mixed 213
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 9
30% 9.87 MB/s
DQ Read 73
DQ Write 58.6
DQ Mixed 38.5
36% 56.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
408GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 84 83 84 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 81.2
Write 75.1
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 83.1
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-023.A00LF 99U5474-028.A00LF Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 859B CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.8% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3227A52 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3227A52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback