Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 3227A52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3227A52  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '23 at 05:41
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470T-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 66.6
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 147
58% 100 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 211
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3083) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.37% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.37%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 396
Write 232
Mixed 244
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 9.1
51% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 38.1
44% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
409GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 83 81 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 76.7
Write 80.6
Mixed 49
SusWrite 81.7
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-023.A00LF 99U5474-028.A00LF Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 859B CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.8% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 23 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACR040D Acer K222HQL
Typical 3227A52 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3227A52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback