Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6750 9,456 User benchmarks, average bench 38% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Memory 77.6 1-Core 30.5 2-Core 42 38% 50 Pts	4-Core 59.9 8-Core 59.8 8% 59.8 Pts	64-Core 60.4 4% 60.4 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GTS 2,598 User benchmarks, average bench 2% EVGA(3842 C765) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	2.78% Terrible	Lighting 2.93 Reflection 5.54 Parallax 1.03 2% 3.17 fps	MRender 6.43 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 4.57 4% 4.34 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.78% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200 7,034 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: R211 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.7% Below average	Read 168 Write 143 Mixed 168 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 11.3 69% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 24.3 DQ Write 77 DQ Mixed 13.1 21% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 91%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB 4,090 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 85GB free Firmware: MZ4OAAB0 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 71.1 Write 80.6 Mixed 7.8 38% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.13 58% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 84%
Samsung SP1213C 120GB 679 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 38GB free Firmware: SV100-25 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 29.6 Write 26.3 Mixed 17.7 18% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.17 4K Write 0.57 4K Mixed 0.38 60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 33%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 30GB free, PID 0723 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 19.8 Write 19 Mixed 17.7 24% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.42 4K Write 3.12 4K Mixed 1.89 187% 3.15 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5 16% 5.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.6 14% 4.73 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	18x
Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples	12x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	7x

GPU
GeForce 8800 GTSNvidiaBench 4%, 3,160 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples	5x

SSD
335 Series 180GBIntel $169Bench 73%, 2,872 samples	4x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	3x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	3x

Value: 24% - Poor

Total price: $269

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16