HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 16%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8133
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '17 at 21:27
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD E1-6015 APU R2 Graphics
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
9.59% Terrible
1-Core 22.1
2-Core 30.7
13% 26.4 Pts
4-Core 33.2
8-Core 40.2
5% 36.7 Pts
64-Core 39.9
3% 39.9 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.59%
Great: 12%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 8133) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 6.1
1% 6.33 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.5
1% 4.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
BHT WR202H0032G E70290F5 31GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90014a Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 165
Write 60.8
Mixed 103
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 7.12
4K Write 3.68
4K Mixed 3.14
714% 4.65 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron MT41K256M16LY-107:N 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 0.5
6% 2.17 GB/s
Latency 245
16% 245 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 12%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 22,583 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 27%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback