Today's hottest deals

Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SRi-F
Memory55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180208
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateJun 12 '23 at 14:19
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 162
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 464
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 762
47% 762 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
MSI(1462 3101) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 16.4
15% 17 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 15.3
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$50
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 406 407 411 390 375 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 434
Mixed 422
SusWrite 395
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 54.2
179% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 350
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 114%
Great: 130%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$50
1GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 405
Write 429
Mixed 415
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 55
178% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 348
262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
Seagate Expansion 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 121 122 119 120 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 96.2
Write 93.4
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 120
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
185% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HUS728T8TALE6L4 8TB
0GB free
Firmware: W410
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,410
Write 6
Mixed 10.2
816% 1,142 MB/s
4K Read 511
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
21,412% 171 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 137%
Hitachi HUS728T8TALE6L4 8TB
2GB free
Firmware: W410
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.1 2.8 3 2.7 3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965694-041.B00G 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 11.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $608
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback