Today's hottest deals

Asus X542URR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemAsus X542URR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X542URR
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211029
Uptime8 Days
Run DateJun 12 '23 at 17:51
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 204
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 426
48% 374 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1A00) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 6
4% 6.47 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 10
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT23B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 294 286 290 288 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 419
Write 299
Mixed 235
SusWrite 290
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 24.6
79% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 208
157% 212 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 126%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
281GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 56 54 55 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 45.9
Write 72.5
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 55.2
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.4
147% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.4% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.3
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X542URR Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X542URR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback