Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics7.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD/USB3  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime9 Days
Run DateJun 13 '23 at 01:15
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T-$254
AM3, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 5 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 42.9
1-Core 22.8
2-Core 41.2
24% 35.6 Pts
4-Core 89
8-Core 110
13% 99.5 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
XFX(1682 3110) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.85% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 12.1
8% 11.8 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 9
8% 9.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.85%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 112 113 116 112 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.7% Poor
Read 198
Write 174
Mixed 175
SusWrite 106
37% 163 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 9
33% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 42.9
DQ Write 95.4
DQ Mixed 55.6
46% 64.6 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 129%
Patriot Pyro SSD 4TB
757GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 134 133 103 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.9% Poor
Read 206
Write 170
Mixed 169
SusWrite 114
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 8.6
28% 9.17 MB/s
DQ Read 36.3
DQ Write 89.8
DQ Mixed 50.1
42% 58.7 MB/s
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$325
1TB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 115 140 141 106 106 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.5% Poor
Read 188
Write 182
Mixed 166
SusWrite 119
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 10
32% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 40.6
DQ Write 86.2
DQ Mixed 53.7
44% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 137%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
505GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 114 112 117 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 107
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 101%
WL4000GSA6472 4.5TB
832GB free
Firmware: 01.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 138 140 143 143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.8% Very good
Read 115
Write 80.2
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 132
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
138% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 101%
FANTOM HD204UI 2TB
415GB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 50.1
Write 24.4
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 25
38% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
35% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.7 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback