Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 17 '23 at 14:39
Run Duration412 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900F-$230
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 179
2-Core 350
112% 208 Pts
4-Core 673
8-Core 1,208
113% 940 Pts
64-Core 1,614
100% 1,614 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$520
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Lighting 247
Reflection 222
Parallax 219
201% 229 fps
MRender 260
Gravity 163
Splatting 133
145% 185 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 166%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
772GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1237 336 361 214 365 361 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,384
Write 1,363
Mixed 1,079
SusWrite 479
241% 1,076 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 64.8
244% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,309
DQ Write 1,214
DQ Mixed 1,236
934% 1,253 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 215%
Great: 276%
SABRENT 1TB
388GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 174 159 177 183 187 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 90%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
762GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 102 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 81.7
Write 103
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 101
69% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
257% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 92%
SDK SSD 12.5TB
11.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.2 7.5 7.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
7.87% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 6.5
9% 7.55 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
63% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.87%
Great: 13%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
344GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 108 114 113 115 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 170
Write 167
Mixed 94.9
SusWrite 113
179% 136 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 0.5
353% 7.73 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 0.4
321% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 105%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
258GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 108 116 114 108 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 106
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 111
138% 101 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.8
255% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
605GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 116 114 116 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 93.2
Write 86.4
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 114
123% 90 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 0.8
364% 6.57 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 0.7
366% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 105%
JMicron Generic DISK01 2TB
464GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 59 78 66 57 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 5
Write 90.7
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 60.7
69% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
14% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 71%
JMicron Generic DISK02 1TB
333GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 62 79 67 57 61 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 282
Write 255
Mixed 261
SusWrite 63
279% 215 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 19.7
1,571% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 17.5
DQ Write 25.9
DQ Mixed 20.8
1,653% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 134%
Great: 70%
JMicron Generic DISK00 2TB
629GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 91 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 276
Write 254
Mixed 268
SusWrite 89.9
292% 222 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 20.1
1,610% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 17.9
DQ Write 25.8
DQ Mixed 21
1,658% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 142%
Great: 75%
JMicron Generic DISK04 4TB
23GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.4 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 62.3
Write 85.9
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 1.1
74% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
41% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 64%
JMicron Generic DISK03 2TB
181GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 91 90 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 99.1
Write 101
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 90.7
123% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 55%
Prolific USB-SATA Bridge 4TB
1TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49% Average
Read 143
Write 140
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 103
149% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 49%
Great: 65%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
221GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 94 93 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 92.1
Write 88.9
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 93
127% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
147% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 32.9
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 32.5
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 11,329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $803
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback