Fujitsu CELSIUS R940

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R940  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3358-A1
Memory119.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170120
Uptime14.2 Days
Run DateDec 11 '17 at 11:47
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 175
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 620
56% 473 Pts
64-Core 1,632
101% 1,632 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.16
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Lighting 41
Reflection 40
Parallax 36.9
33% 39.3 fps
MRender 50.6
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 39.3
34% 42.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690
1TB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,732
Write 838
Mixed 1,218
278% 1,263 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 17.8
94% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 18.1
21% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 150%
Great: 354%
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GB
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 512
Write 407
Mixed 424
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 14
81% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 44.2
DQ Mixed 13.7
16% 27 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
470GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 158
Write 145
Mixed 127
107% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.21
67% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
205GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 166
Mixed 143
121% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.19
65% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
106% Outstanding
MC Read 48.9
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 41
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 18.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 106%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R940 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R940

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback